Romance scams reach every age group, but the financial damage is heavily concentrated among older adults — and the gap isn't small. Understanding why, and how to actually talk about it with a parent or older relative, matters more than another generic warning.
What the numbers actually show
The FBI's 2024 Internet Crime Report recorded 17,910 confidence fraud/romance scam complaints totaling $672 million in losses. Adults 60 and older accounted for about 43% of those complaints but a disproportionate 58% of the dollars lost — roughly $389.3 million — meaning the average loss per complaint in that age group runs far higher than for younger victims. A February 2026 AARP survey adds context to why: nearly 1 in 10 adults 50 and older (an estimated 11 million Americans) said they'd encountered an online romantic connection that asked them for money or cryptocurrency, and interestingly, adults 50–64 reported facing these solicitations at roughly double the rate of adults 65 and older (13% versus 5%) — the risk starts well before what most people picture as "elderly."
Why older adults lose more, even when targeted less often
Several factors compound here. Older adults are statistically more likely to have accumulated savings, home equity, or retirement accounts to draw from, which is exactly what makes a target attractive to a scammer running a numbers game across hundreds of conversations. Widowhood and adult children moving away can mean less day-to-day social contact for a scammer's attention to fill. And critically, per the same AARP research, 45% of adults 50+ say they simply lack knowledge about how these scams specifically work — not because they're less capable, but because the tactics (love bombing, engineered urgency, coached secrecy) are unfamiliar in a way that younger, more online-native adults may recognize faster.
The underreporting problem
According to AARP's Fraud Watch Network, 55% of romance scam victims never report their losses anywhere, and among those who do, only 26% contact law enforcement and 23% contact their bank. Amy Nofziger, the Fraud Watch Network's Senior Director of Victim Support, put it directly: "Romance scams can affect anyone. Smart, financially stable, socially active adults are all targets." Shame, and a fear of being seen as gullible or incapable of managing their own affairs, are consistently cited as the reason victims — especially older victims — stay quiet, which lets the same scammers keep operating against others.
How to actually bring this up with a parent or older relative
Leading with "you're being scammed" tends to trigger defensiveness, precisely because the scam has spent weeks building a relationship that feels real and important. A few things tend to work better in practice: ask to see the profile and the conversation out of genuine curiosity rather than suspicion; ask whether they've had a video call yet, framed as excitement rather than a test; and mention specific, concrete patterns (never available for video, a sudden financial ask, discouraging them from telling family) rather than a general accusation. If money has already been sent, the goal shifts from persuasion to speed — helping them contact the bank or gift card issuer immediately matters more than winning the argument about whether it's a scam.
Practical safeguards that don't require conflict
Suggesting a shared reverse-image-search check on a new match's photo, framed as something fun to do together rather than an accusation, gets past a lot of defensiveness. Some families set up a standing, judgment-free agreement in advance: any online partner asking for money gets a call to a specific family member before anything is sent — not because trust is assumed to be misplaced, but because it's a smart practice for anyone, at any age, dating online.
Financial safeguards worth setting up in advance
Many banks now offer transaction alerts, spending limits, or "trusted contact" designations that notify a family member of unusual account activity without giving them day-to-day account access — worth setting up before it's needed, not after. Some financial institutions in the US, Canada, and UK also participate in bank-employee fraud-prevention training programs specifically designed to help tellers recognize when an older customer is making an unusual wire transfer or large gift-card purchase under pressure; a bank employee gently asking questions at the counter has stopped real cases in progress. None of this requires taking away someone's financial independence — it's closer to a seatbelt than a restriction.
This works both directions
The same conversation is worth having preemptively, not just reactively — bringing up romance scams as a general topic before anyone in the family is dating online removes the sting of it feeling targeted at one specific relative, and normalizes the idea that checking in about a new online relationship is just sensible practice, not an accusation aimed at anyone in particular.